News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ooh.directory by cactacea on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @10:29AM (#33720368)
Did someone just reinvent Yahoo as it existed in 1994?
Re:Ooh.directory by saboot on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @10:31AM (#33720399)
I hope so, it was useful then, useful now!
Re:Ooh.directory by monkeynotes on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @10:56AM (#33720793)
I don't think it's that simple. It was useful then because web discoverability was an unsolved problem, and web content was tiny compared to today. A directory sort of fit the need. As the web grew directories became bloated and hard to navigate, search became more useful.

This is more of a nostalgia or niche link list. It's not the same purpose as yahoo in the 90s.

Re:Ooh.directory by fnfontana on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @11:05AM (#33720926)
I think that search engines like Google are unbeatable to find content that we already know about. On the other hand, those lists are great to discover what we don't already know about, such as new topics, etc. Just like the awesome lists on GitHub.
Re:Ooh.directory by luispauloml on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @11:36AM (#33721359)
> Just like the awesome lists on GitHub.

What are these lists you're talking about? Could you give an example?

Re:Ooh.directory by OctopusLupid on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @11:41AM (#33721440)
Re:Ooh.directory by ivan_ah on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @11:48AM (#33721556)
Here is an awesome list of awesome lists on various topics: https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome#contents
Re:Ooh.directory by mattarm on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @11:13AM (#33721040)
> Just like the awesome lists on GitHub.

My thought exactly, and also why I don't just search 'latest news' on Google every morning. Human curation is a thing. (not sure how much human curation goes into ooh.directory, but I'm pretty sure they don't use Google's ranking algorithms to surface links)

Re:Ooh.directory by philgyford on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @11:18AM (#33721106)
Hi, it's my site. I find the links by exploring*, and I add and categorise them manually.

* or "surfing the net", if you're old enough.

Re:Ooh.directory by rjewell on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @11:37AM (#33721379)
doing god’s work
Re:Ooh.directory by blowski on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @11:00AM (#33720871)
If you don't think it's useful for you, then don't use it. I like it, so I'm going to use it.
Re:Ooh.directory by orlp on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @12:00PM (#33721680)
Web discoverability was solved and then unsolved once again by endless SEO.
Re:Ooh.directory by ralmeida4381 on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @12:14PM (#33721843)
LOL, that was my first impression! Obviously the milenials doesn't know about yahoo.

But well... the problem is almost the same: too few info == too much info => No enough info to make decisions.

Re:Ooh.directory by cercatrova on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @12:33PM (#33722106)
Millennials? Or Gen Z?

The youngest Millennial is 26, so they probably knew at least a little when they were young about what Yahoo was.

Re:Ooh.directory by Mezzie on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @12:24PM (#33721982)
Hey now, a couple of us remember! ;)

Yahoo is how baby me learned the word 'hierarchical'.

Re:Ooh.directory by cactacea on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @12:50PM (#33722320)
Sorry to break it to you but I'm a millennial lol
Re:Ooh.directory by pavlov on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @12:30PM (#33722072)
It's not a coincidence: there's a shadow of an exclamation point in the logo, and the color scheme hints towards Yahoo!'s trademark purple too.
Re:Ooh.directory by aendruk on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @01:43PM (#33723001)
And the name. Yahooh