The scikit learn documentation is also really fantastic

statsmodels, too!

I agree, there was lot of effort put into python documentation i believe.

I'll have to disagree. Many things about it are a constant source of annoyance for me, such as the fact that function arguments and return types aren't listed in a standard format with a short description of each and instead they expect you to read the entire (often quite large) paragraph of text below each function to find that information, and the fact that a lot of information isn't found in the page you'd expect it to be in (for example, the methods available for the list type aren't in the Built-in Types page even though lists are mentioned there, nor in its own dedicated list page, but are instead in a "More on Lists" section in the Data Structures page which apparently isn't linked in the types page at all)

Completely agree. The Python docs are almost unreadable to me. Every time I’m looking for something (a function parameter, example usage, etc.) it’s the same:

- I Google it

- I look for the official docs page (usually 5th or 6th result)

- I tried to find my answer but don’t understand the organization and cannot find the correct keywords to Ctrl-F

- I go back to my Google search frustrated and try to find a suitable StackOverflow answer instead

In comparison with Go the official docs are usually the first or second Google results and the docs are easy to navigate and understand.

On the nail.