Re:The erasure of women from online pregnancy literature
by dang on Saturday November 19, 2022 @09:30PM
(#33677507)
(Separately from the topic of this thread:) It looks like you've been using HN primarily for ideological and political battle. That's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for. We ban accounts that do this, regardless of what ideology they favor or disfavor, so if you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules from now on, we'd appreciate it:
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme...
Edit: it looks like this has been a problem for years:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31786872 (June 2022)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23367213 (May 2020)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23305113 (May 2020)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21263982 (Oct 2019)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20271626 (June 2019)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17743552 (Aug 2018)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15428615 (Oct 2017)
Please stop using HN this way and start using it in the intended spirit from now on. Your account is way, way, way over the line here.
A non-falsifiable belief cannot be tested or disproved. It can only be asserted.
No one should have to knuckle under to non-falsifiable beliefs. If my neighbor claims they are a bird, I should not be required to go along with it. It is not unkind to not go along with it. It is not being anti anything to act in accord with known falsifiable beliefs. It is living in reality.