News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Latam Airlines Airbus A320neo hits fire engine on runway ... by jeffbee on Saturday November 19, 2022 @03:28PM (#33674310)
Based on the charts and the video, I don't think these rescue trucks needed to cross a taxiway before crossing the runway. I listened to the recordings on liveatc and nothing jumps out. In the interests of open mindedness I should consider that it's not impossible that the ground vehicles had clearance and the aircraft did not. But it would be pretty shocking for a commercial air crew to take off without clearance.
Re:Latam Airlines Airbus A320neo hits fire engine on runway ... by sokoloff on Saturday November 19, 2022 @05:07PM (#33675297)
Do you have a URL for a current chart? The old, single runway config would require proceeding on taxiway A to get to 34. The latest chart I could find online was 2019/2020, but there’s no way to get to the runway without transiting a taxiway on that side.

https://pe.ivao.aero/storage/download/cartas/1595026538_cart...

Re:Latam Airlines Airbus A320neo hits fire engine on runway ... by jeffbee on Sunday November 20, 2022 @12:26PM (#33683049)
That's the same chart I googled up. Judging from a quite recent press release it seems like the project is years behind schedule and the taxiway is at best inactive and it looks to me like it doesn't really exist yet, still under construction. Aerial imagery from this year on Google Maps shows it as bare dirt. This image[1] from the October 22 press release seems to show the new taxiway as under construction.

The final thing is the video from the passenger on TikTok shows the rescue truck kicking up a cloud of dust, making it seem like they were crossing bare earth.

1: https://static1.simpleflyingimages.com/wordpress/wp-content/...