News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tailscale Funnel by antx on Friday November 18, 2022 @10:37AM (#33656236)
Tailscale actually has a great write-up on the subject [0]

TLDR; Ideally, IPv6. Otherwise, NAT traversal techniques such as STUN, or hole-punching.

[0]: https://tailscale.com/blog/how-nat-traversal-works/

Re:Tailscale Funnel by lxgr on Friday November 18, 2022 @10:52AM (#33656500)
> Ideally, IPv6.

Yes, if you have it everywhere you want to host services and everywhere you want to access these services, that's great. Realistically, I think it's going to be decades until an IPv6-only service is feasible.

> Otherwise, NAT traversal techniques such as STUN, or hole-punching.

Neither of which Wireguard supports out of the box. To be clear, it absolutely shouldn't – it's a different concern, and the appeal of Wireguard is specifically that it isn't trying to do everything and the kitchen sink.

So, is there an easy-to-use NAT traversal orchestration service for Wireguard out there that isn't Tailscale?

Re:Tailscale Funnel by antx on Friday November 18, 2022 @12:41PM (#33658474)
Re:Tailscale Funnel by secunit on Friday November 25, 2022 @09:34PM (#33749303)
"Inspired by Tailscale"

So, before Tailscale there wasn't a solution. Now we have one, but it's yet another tool we have to manually manage.