It's probably more of a neutral signal; there's a "anything that isn't a vaccine" crowd that latches on to any treatment proposed that isn't a vaccine (although now they're down on Paxlovid?).

Doesn't say whether it works or not, just whether or not it is a vaccine.

It's almost as if people, knowing options, want options. But, surely there must be only One True Way, and those pesky outliers who would rather select their choice of risk management product from a free market are wrong and must be injected with instructions to manufacture a lot of one just specific bilogical defense.

Never promoted just showed data. Is that promotion. Here is data: https://www.ivmmeta.com

Somehow your ad hominem argument via a strawman fallacy projected on a medical professional who provided valid data when orthodoxy opposed this data on emotionally biased political grounds is not super compelling.