News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google: Let it snow by ck2 on Saturday December 17, 2011 @10:27AM (#3364368)
Hey google folk - snow is pretty and nice but how about considering making your home page black or put a black ribbon (ala "censor" band) to alert more people to the SOPA vote moved to the 21st?
Re:Google: Let it snow by nyellin on Saturday December 17, 2011 @11:49AM (#3364535)
There is a hidden reason for stunts like these. They spread by word of mouth to non-technical users. Those users try them, fail, and then ask their children why. Just like that, Chrome steals one more user from Internet Explorer 6.

On the other hand, Google opposes SOPA, but being overtly political has its problems...

Re:Google: Let it snow by kkwok on Sunday December 18, 2011 @12:47PM (#3367043)
I didn't even think about this. That's brilliant.
Re:Google: Let it snow by nyellin on Sunday December 18, 2011 @04:40PM (#3367566)
Yup. It's Christmas time. Everyone sees their parents.
Re:Google: Let it snow by jader201 on Saturday December 17, 2011 @11:20AM (#3364466)
I'm all for opposition to SOPA, but does this really fit on this discussion?
Re:Google: Let it snow by ticks on Saturday December 17, 2011 @11:56AM (#3364549)
Google's homepage shouldn't have anything to do with politics IMO. Leave it to the organisations that specialise in those sorts of issues.
Re:Google: Let it snow by mike-cardwell on Saturday December 17, 2011 @01:39PM (#3364773)
Exactly. Why do people want yet another hugely rich corporation using their money to interfere in politics?

What if Google was pro SOPA? Would you be happy with them advertising for it on their front page?

America needs to learn to govern it's self without the intervention of corporations. America doesn't need more of them getting involved.

Re:Google: Let it snow by scarmig on Saturday December 17, 2011 @02:12PM (#3364863)
That's very idealistic but isn't really a really good perspective of the situation facing us.

Whatever resistance to SOPA that exists in the federal government exists because of some technology companies making very loud noises. Simply saying, "well, corporations shouldn't have a privileged voice in government at all, so we should condemn corporations even when they're arguing on the right side of an issue" is stabbing your allies in the back. Curtailing Google's political activism won't teach America to govern itself without corporations. It will just give the bad guys even less resistance to their agenda.

Google maybe shouldn't care about politics. But politics cares about Google. And, moreover, the rest of us. We can start telling Google to GTFO of politics once there are other democratic institutions to take its place. Until then, unilateral disarmament is not an option. The best we can do is remind people that Google is a temporary tactical ally, not some angelic being that does no evil.

Re:Google: Let it snow by seanp2k2 on Saturday December 17, 2011 @04:47PM (#3365189)
I agree and I'd support Google putting a message about SOPA on their homepage. However, the commenter above also has a point in that corporations shouldn't be involved in politics.

I'd go a step further and advocate pushing to get ALL the money out of politics. That said, with the way things work at this very moment, anti-SOPA needs all the corporate sponsorship it can get.

My hope is that people will once again be the biggest voice in government instead of corporations.

Re:Google: Let it snow by mseebach on Saturday December 17, 2011 @02:56PM (#3364974)
> What if Google was pro SOPA? Would you be happy with them advertising for it on their front page?

You're writing that as if SOPA was one side of an argument where good people could reasonably be on either one side or the other, and HN and Google just happens to be on the same.

But it's not, SOPA has a right and a wrong side. We're on the right side, Google is on the right side and good people are either uninformed or on the right side. It's not unreasonable to wish for Google to employ some of their considerable clout in evangelising the right side.

Re:Google: Let it snow by mike-cardwell on Saturday December 17, 2011 @03:27PM (#3365040)
"My opinion is right because I say it is. Anyone who doesn't hold the same opinion is either bad, or needs educating"

Well, that's me convinced.

Re:Google: Let it snow by KeithMajhor on Saturday December 17, 2011 @07:51PM (#3365525)
I don't know why you're getting downvoted. People get stupid when they're this opposed to something. His argument had absolutely no value and your characterization of it was spot on.
Re:Google: Let it snow by waqf on Saturday December 17, 2011 @08:27PM (#3365593)
I don't think mike-cardwell deserves downvoting either, but I don't think your (and his) characterization was quite fair.

mseebach didn't intend to make a convincing anti-SOPA argument, he was commenting under the assumption that his audience was already opposed to SOPA. He may have been wrong — that's a danger on the internet — but I don't think that makes him stupid.

Re:Google: Let it snow by KeithMajhor on Saturday December 17, 2011 @09:36PM (#3365725)
Lets break it down.

mseebach: "You're writing that as if SOPA was one side of an argument where good people could reasonably be on either one side or the other, and HN and Google just happens to be on the same. But it's not, SOPA has a right and a wrong side. We're on the right side..."

parody: "My opinion is right because I say it is."

mseebach: "Google is on the right side and good people are either uninformed or on the right side."

parody: "Anyone who doesn't hold the same opinion is either bad, or needs educating."

mseebach: "It's not unreasonable to wish for Google to employ some of their considerable clout in evangelising the right side."

I was wrong. This part has value. The "right side" part of it is overreaching though. In my opinion.

Also, I didn't call him stupid, I called the downvoters stupid. I meant it in the way people usually do: I don't like it. The people who can downvote are supposed to be the pillars of our community. Yet they seem more interested in policing opinions than quality. More interested in SOPA than HN. Then they turn around and complain that it's all going to shit. Come on... lets promote the strongest arguments and promptly refute the lousy ones.

Re:Google: Let it snow by burgerbrain on Saturday December 17, 2011 @04:18PM (#3365146)
If you actually need convincing that SOPA is wrong and are not just being unnecessarily argumentative, then I really don't know what to say to you... Do you know what SOPA is?
Re:Google: Let it snow by mike-cardwell on Saturday December 17, 2011 @04:38PM (#3365176)
I don't need convincing. I am aware that it is a bad thing. I am also aware that Google getting involved is a bad thing. I am also aware that the people on the other side of the argument aren't necessarily bad or uneducated people like the person I was replying to claimed.
Re:Google: Let it snow by kelnos on Monday December 19, 2011 @08:33AM (#3369537)
I am also aware that Google getting involved is a bad thing.

That's an opinion, one which I (and others) don't agree with.

SOPA is bad for Google, too. Why shouldn't they be involved? The fact of the matter is that corporations are involved in US politics. Like it or dislike it, it's a fact. Advising anti-SOPA corporations to stay out of the fight just feels like a case of misplaced principles. Suggesting that Google sit on the sidelines severely hampers efforts to get the word out and stir up anti-SOPA sentiment among people who may not understand the issue all that well, or may not be particularly interested yet.

I want SOPA to fail. If Google can help with that, I'm all for it, as long as they don't do anything shady or illegal while providing that help.

Re:Google: Let it snow by patrickaljord on Saturday December 17, 2011 @05:00PM (#3365223)
He didn't say uneducated, just uninformed.
Re:Google: Let it snow by gws on Sunday December 18, 2011 @03:10AM (#3366247)
> we are on the right side

There's no right or wrong only better and worse. Which obviously depends on the point of view. What people usually refer to as 'right' is simply what is better for most people (like opposing SOPA)

Re:Google: Let it snow by zobzu on Saturday December 17, 2011 @11:53PM (#3365969)
so it should just have ads for google master plan's products? :)

I would sure like anti SOPA messages from Google. Would give me a warm feeling and a hope for a better future too.

Re:Google: Let it snow by uberzet on Saturday December 17, 2011 @02:17PM (#3364877)