Re:Sam Bankman-Fried tries to explain himself
by nailer on Wednesday November 16, 2022 @04:15PM
(#33630744)
Tornado Cash is private banking. The writer of the code did nothing wrong by writing it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Sam Bankman-Fried tries to explain himself
by Beltalowda on Wednesday November 16, 2022 @04:24PM
(#33630868)
He wasn't arrested for "writing the code", but for direct involvements (and making large sums of profit) for money laundering. Whether he is guilty of that: we'll see what comes up in the trail, but he certainly wasn't arrested "for writing code".
Re:Sam Bankman-Fried tries to explain himself
by nailer on Wednesday November 16, 2022 @05:08PM
(#33631498)
I have heard that too but it’s hard to know (either way) what he was arrested for as he hasn’t been charged after three months detention.
The police statement is https://www.fiod.nl/arrest-of-suspected-developer-of-tornado... - it seems to say he facilitated money laundering. Which could mean simply writing code or could mean doing more.
More info on https://www.notion.so/FreeAlex-campaign-1f8db0a2fdfc48b3b86a... which is a horrible notion site with a strange and awful UI.
Re:Sam Bankman-Fried tries to explain himself
by leesalminen on Wednesday November 16, 2022 @04:19PM
(#33630786)
Open source code should be considered protected speech. The fact that it’s not should scare the daylights out of any OSS contributor.
Also, privacy should be a human right.
If you disagree with the above, you might be a fascist.
Re:Sam Bankman-Fried tries to explain himself
by ceejayoz on Wednesday November 16, 2022 @04:29PM
(#33630925)
It's protected speech. What you do with it can be criminal.
Code for an Arduino that moves a robotic arm is legal. Using it to pull a trigger and kill someone isn't.
Re:Sam Bankman-Fried tries to explain himself
by leesalminen on Wednesday November 16, 2022 @04:31PM
(#33630954)
Of course. Was the tornado cash person arrested for using the code in an illegal way or just for publishing the code?