Wikipedians are rebelling against “unethical” Wikipedia fundraising banners

Re:Wikipedians are rebelling against “unethical” Wikipedia f... by zasdffaa on Tuesday November 15, 2022 @10:58AM (#33610797)

Can you provide links to any of this? I'm also unable to find any org called SeRCH, perhaps I mis-spelt it.

edit: I repeat my request more strongly. I've looked more and even "intersectional scientific method" gets almost nothing except a couple of posts on twitter claiming the same and a website https://battlepenguin.com/politics/wikipedia-is-a-source-of-... which doesn't back anything up - are you affiliated with either of these?

I am wondering if you are deliberately spreading FUD

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Wikipedians are rebelling against “unethical” Wikipedia f... by jmcphers on Tuesday November 15, 2022 @11:32AM (#33611330)

Parent post is on target. Here is the website for the SeRCH organization:

https://www.vanguardstem.com/serch

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Wikipedians are rebelling against “unethical” Wikipedia f... by zasdffaa on Tuesday November 15, 2022 @11:45AM (#33611548)

and where is the 'unscientific, unencyclopedic woo-woo'?

And where is the evidence it's related to wikipedia?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Wikipedians are rebelling against “unethical” Wikipedia f... by MikePlacid on Tuesday November 15, 2022 @12:32PM (#33612309)

> And where is the evidence it's related to wikipedia?

To WMF. Right there on their webpage. They are proud of it:

https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2021/09/08/wikimedia-fo...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Wikipedians are rebelling against “unethical” Wikipedia f... by zasdffaa on Tuesday November 15, 2022 @12:59PM (#33612652)

Brill. It's only taken an hour to get the first solid piece of info. Now, where's the "unscientific, unencyclopedic woo-woo" and hyperspace?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Wikipedians are rebelling against “unethical” Wikipedia f... by zasdffaa on Tuesday November 15, 2022 @11:52AM (#33611664)

Sod it, post flagged

[ Parent | on HN ]