News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sam Bankman-Fried vs. the Match King by caminante on Sunday November 13, 2022 @01:23PM (#33585774)
> Seems like they are just stating objective facts without putting any judgement to it.

Isn't the parent's comment an opinion based on anecdotal experiences?

If you have data to share, that'd be helpful.

Re:Sam Bankman-Fried vs. the Match King by Kiro on Sunday November 13, 2022 @01:25PM (#33585803)
Changed it to "claim". My point was that they're not picking a side and that there's no need to get defensive about it.
Re:Sam Bankman-Fried vs. the Match King by caminante on Sunday November 13, 2022 @02:10PM (#33586293)
> Changed it to "claim".

The "objective" qualifier is what's problematic.

Re:Sam Bankman-Fried vs. the Match King by Kiro on Sunday November 13, 2022 @03:00PM (#33586739)
It's obvious what I mean. Everyone is clearly bending the truth to create the juiciest narrative but no need to attack people just because they're downplaying the most insane conspiracy theories. This is not a movie script.

You make it sound like the poster is defending her just because they don't agree that the world is secretly controlled by a bunch of economics professors.