it's much more common to wish for bigger windows because you're hot than because you're falling asleep
(1000 ppmv - 420 ppmv) co₂ = 580 ppmv co₂
r 20° / 1 atm = 24 ℓ/mol
1 kg co₂ / day / 人 = 11.6 mg co₂ / s / 人
30 人 · 11.6 mg co₂ / s / 人 / (44 g co₂/mol co₂) = 7.9 mmol co₂ / s (a classroom)
7.9 mmol co₂ / s · 24 ℓ/mol = 0.19 ℓ co₂ / s
0.19 ℓ co₂ / s / 580 ppmv co₂ = 330 ℓ / s (of air)
in medieval units that's about 700 'cfm'
if the classroom has 10 m² of open windows you're fine, even an undetectable draft of 0.03 m/s is sufficient, but if it has 1 m² you need a barely detectable breeze of 0.3 m/s, if it has 0.1 m² you need a pretty noticeable breeze of 3 m/s ('light breeze' on the beaufort scale), and if it has a little 100-mm-square register you need 30 m/s which is a 'violent storm' on the beaufort scale (above 'whole gale')
at 'fresh breeze' (8–11 m/s) you need 300–400 cm² of window
well designed ventilation systems can provide this kind of airflow while controlling the temperature and humidity but they are at a big disadvantage because 300–400 cm² of window is a lot smaller than 300–400 cm² of duct
sometimes that's not what matters most tho
Where does "opening the windows" fit in a scale of "well designed ventilation systems" ?
I'm not being flip, or snarky - I'm serious.
I don't think it's terribly sophisticated or haughty to consider lack of opening windows to be a poverty.
Hotel rooms, hospital rooms, classrooms ... whatever ... windows that cannot be opened is a poverty.