> Go makes you believe you dealt with the error, but instead you just forget about it.
Can you explain that? Touching every context of an error propagation seems opposite of forgetting about it.
Can you explain that? Touching every context of an error propagation seems opposite of forgetting about it.
Also, checked exceptions are very much not like that, and being able to handle errors of a logical unit is also beneficiary (e.g. transactions). You are free to use the scope-size that makes sense for the given use case.