1) That would be an obvious lie. You posted 3 links (not 1, not even 2, but 3) to the Xe/Xena/Christine website. The intent is to smear, disrupt, and spread negative misinformation.
2) On almost any Vlang related thread of significance, see how often and what type of accounts are posting the Xe/Xena/Christine website.
hn.algolia.com may assist you.
> But I can definitely see where OP is coming from
As in, you agree with rmanolis, who made very obvious smears and lies about V. And is an advocate of Zig.
Let's refresh your short memory, as you are "so innocent", as to what rmanolis typed.
"V promised a lot of stuff as ready but has undelivered most of them..." --rmanolis
"If V was truthful like Zig..." --rmanolis
But to bring home the point, after you posted the smear links (which take conscious effort to collect them together), you add this gem with them.
> I can completely understand OP when they are saying "V promised a lot of stuff as ready but has undelivered most of them and people lost trust." -- that was my view too.
Because of your short memory issue, allow me to remind you, that last part was definitively you.
"-- that was my view too.", as in you agree with rmanolis, the one clearly smearing Vlang and an advocate of Zig. And that was after you posted the V is vaporware smear link.
> No single programming language is worth getting this wound up about.
Excuse me, who is so narrowly focused about a language?
This thread is about the Zip Function, not just Vlang, and has 4 other programming languages to talk about.
Yet, you chose to target and smear Vlang specifically, while mentioning nothing about Zip functions or the other languages.
Hey suprfnk, are you alright?
Instead of trolling, maybe engage in some other hobby. I'm done with you, so truly feel free to assess the situation and yourself. It might be good for you to take a step back and relax a bit.
If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.
I have been nothing but civil and open-minded, I have not smeared vlang in any way, I have merely been asking questions as an outside observer.
You, on the other hand, have been aggressively defensive, and have been projecting an almost paranoid "everything and everyone is against vlang" attitude. I almost start thinking that you are the one trolling me.
If not, I sincerely hope you will take a step back and assess the situation and yourself -- and try to relax a bit. No single programming language is worth getting this wound up about.