This. Brand new account spreading blatant lies.
The way I find the OP isn't a blatant lie. It's the truth: how I find the OP.
Now I'm wondering about you.
I don't know how you ask these questions if you read the parent's post.
Clearly, the parent lays out situations where going off/on blockchain dilutes visibility.
The cross-collateralization of FTX assets wasn't on blockchain.
"No blockchain can ever guarantee there's any visibility or accountability."
Ever? Clearly this sentence is false. It takes only one counterexample to prove it.
Here's the counterexample. If all the world's money are on a single blockchain and there are no banks, the blockchain guarantees visibility and possibly accountability.
Please don't be gratuitously negative. It's to your benefit to be precise.
Your example misrepresents reality and a lack of understanding the point.
Where on the blockchain did it track FTX's cross collateralization?
There is your counterexample.
As far your ad hominem on negativity, I have no idea what you're referring to.
Visibility or accountability of what? Many blockchains are public.
I find you not only misinformed but possibly intentionally trying to mislead people.
"The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."
- Paul Kedrosky