News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:TikTok’s Stratospheric Rise: An Oral History by saiya-jin on Thursday November 10, 2022 @07:39AM (#33545572)
You could say the same about youtube, all you mention and much more. Yes I know there are differences.

What irks me with these sort of uncritical apologists is how they see it as second coming of Jesus, when all I ever seen praised about tiktok keeps me hard in 'meh' category. I am sure its addictive as I see it clearly in other's people kids, but so is heroin and I feel 0 urge to get hooked on it nor make it available for my small children.

Life, and its ultimate quality and beauty is something completely, utterly different thing. It never came, comes or ever will come off the screen.

Re:TikTok’s Stratospheric Rise: An Oral History by lelandfe on Thursday November 10, 2022 @08:20AM (#33545982)
> You could say the same about youtube, all you mention and much more

YouTube's discoverability is abysmal, so it's really not comparable. I use YouTube every day and have not had it recommend to me a new channel I'm interested in... a year? When I refresh my homepage, nearly one half of the videos stay the same. I've already seen 5 of them.

> I am sure its addictive as I see it clearly in other's people kids, but so is heroin

Well, I'm not praising its addictiveness, right? I'm praising the people that post on it.

TikTok is essentially Chinese spyware, and the quality of its algorithm is terrifying. But that's really it – it's just a good content platform, and its scale means its attracted great content. Ascribing all these silly qualities to it, like being in opposition to life, and similar to heroin, is hyperbole to the extreme.