News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We will not pursue the potential acquisition of FTX by melenaboija on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @06:27PM (#33539685)
> If Binance goes, crypto isn't coming back

Interesting statement for a decentralized asset

Re:We will not pursue the potential acquisition of FTX by mrtksn on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @06:34PM (#33539752)
What decentralised asset?
Re:We will not pursue the potential acquisition of FTX by melenaboija on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @06:39PM (#33539802)
Sorry, crypto.

I don’t know much about the topic and sometimes I get confused with the concepts crypto, currency, non fungible, token and I call it asset asset to generalize. So, what makes a crypto to be a crypto?

Re:We will not pursue the potential acquisition of FTX by mrtksn on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @06:48PM (#33539912)
That's just the label, nothing decentralised is left. See, as it turns out, to trade you need to find people and people are found in central locations. Okay, there are still many exchanges but this is mostly incidental and it makes sense to end up with single exchange eventually.
Re:We will not pursue the potential acquisition of FTX by TheOtherHobbes on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @07:07PM (#33540151)
I'm enjoying the irony that practical crypto could not possibly be less like an decentralised peer-to-peer system for exchanging value if it tried to be.

As you soon as someone creates an exchange - and especially as soon as they start packaging funds into absolutely any kind of financial instrument/service - they've effectively reinvented deregulated banking with no deposit protection and extra risk.

Re:We will not pursue the potential acquisition of FTX by ausudhz on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @09:24PM (#33541401)
and additionally who run these exchange has no economical background whatsoever. Like an ignorant trying to reinvent the wheel into a squared one and poaching it as a new invention.

But is "decentralized"...

Re:We will not pursue the potential acquisition of FTX by pa7x1 on Thursday November 10, 2022 @05:28AM (#33544587)
Don't let the schadenfreude and confirmation bias get to you. Centralized exchanges never had anything to do with the value proposition of cryptocurrency. And trading on them is just speculation with no relation to crypto. It's what gets views in the press, though.

Whenever news like these occur there is always a bunch of "I knew it would all fall down" self-validation comments in HN. Yet it really doesn't fall down, after over a decade. Perhaps it's time to consider that you are looking at the wrong thing and barking at the wrong tree.

Of all these collapses there is 0 decentralized exchanges (i.e. on-chain) involved. Pretty much because they can't, by design. That's the value proposition. Unstoppable exchanges, transparent, publicly verifiable, highest availability.

What you have seen all this year is more and more validation that centralized finance is problematic by design (3AC, Celsius, BlockFi, FTX...) while decentralized finance comes unscathed (Uniswap, Aave, Curve, MakerDAO...).

Re:We will not pursue the potential acquisition of FTX by netheril96 on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @09:10PM (#33541284)
It’s interesting because it is wrong. MtGox had far larger dominance in crypto trading than Binance, flopped significantly, and it didn’t prevent crypto from coming back.
Re:We will not pursue the potential acquisition of FTX by coffeebeqn on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @10:44PM (#33541935)
In dollar amounts it was a tiny tiny exchange though