> As the user up thread stated

That was me.

> he is literally not accountable because he answers to no one

Zuck said he wanted to take accountability for overhiring and then having to do layoffs. So the question is, what does the theoretical possibility of employees resigning or users leaving have to do with accountability for overhiring and layoffs?

It has nothing to do with accountability. The reason that everyone has a visceral response to him saying he accountable is because we know it is not true

Sorry, I was confused by your reply. I thought you were arguing with me? Maybe not. But I'm still confused by it.

Ah, no. I’m in agreement that he is not being accountable. I am perhaps taking it farther in arguing that he is incapable of being accountable given how meta is structured