News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Meta lays off 11,000 people by jacobsenscott on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @09:25AM (#33532005)
This isn't hard for Zuck - he just directs his subordinates to layoff a bunch of people, and then goes back to swimming in his vault of cash. Losing x billion of essentially infinity money is the same as losing no money. Once you reach Zuck's level of wealth you can't really even conceive of non-billionairs as the being same species as you, much less empathize with them.
Re:Meta lays off 11,000 people by abstractmath on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @09:40AM (#33532214)
Have you ever managed or led people?

Did you find it easier or harder than when you didn’t manage people?

Have you ever laid someone off or fired them? Was it so easy?

Re:Meta lays off 11,000 people by pc86 on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @10:16AM (#33532761)
> Have you ever laid someone off or fired them? Was it so easy?

I've heard this sentiment from people who have laid those off and it always falls flat to me.

Laying off 1 or 100 people compared to being laid off - especially when the person doing the firing, usually a Director or above, is making 3-4x at least what the line employees are - is like comparing pricking your finger with a needle to cutting it off with a dull knife.

It should be difficult if you're not a sociopath, but they're so incomparable it's not even a statement worth making or considering.

Re:Meta lays off 11,000 people by abstractmath on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @02:11PM (#33536418)
I’m not arguing that laying people off is nearly as hard as getting laid off.

I’m arguing against the idea that if you’re a manager or have money, that moments like this are easy or that there’s no empathy. i’m not saying that anyone should feel bad for directors, CEOs, or whoever, but they shouldn’t paint a ridiculous straw man either.

You could even argue that in Zuck’s position, money is a non-factor. He has more than enough money. What he doesn’t have is a beloved and future-proof company, and these layoffs only push him further from that.

Re:Meta lays off 11,000 people by avgcorrection on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @07:02PM (#33540105)
Billionaires are that because they have exploited the surplus value of their underlings. To say that they “care” about them is clearly a contradiction.
Re:Meta lays off 11,000 people by bombcar on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @10:33AM (#33533019)
Laying off one or five or ten good people is a tragedy.

Laying off 13,000 is a statistic.

(Based on a badly misquoted Stalin.)

Re:Meta lays off 11,000 people by staticman2 on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @10:50AM (#33533327)
Zuckerberg has complete voting control of Facebook. Nobody can remove him as CEO.

If this sort of thing bothered Zuck, he would not lay people off.

Re:Meta lays off 11,000 people by Yhippa on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @02:09PM (#33536399)
Is he doing this to prop up his stock price for himself?
Re:Meta lays off 11,000 people by JKCalhoun on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @12:01PM (#33534484)
To be sure, laying off employees would be not be easy. Imagine if these were people you had lunch with, chatted with in the office every day, knew their husbands, wives....
Re:Meta lays off 11,000 people by at-fates-hands on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @01:14PM (#33535632)
Do you think Zuck was that close with any of the 11,000 people who were laid off?

If it was a small startup (been there done that) then yeah, when you see people day-to-day, and get to know them and their lives outside of work? Really hard to fire people, knowing how it will affect the other people in their lives.

A multi-national, multi-billion dollar company with 80,000+ employees? I'm not so sure.