News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Introducing Palantir's first open source releases by caycep on Wednesday December 14, 2011 @01:50PM (#3353055)
it would be interesting to see what the internal divisions of palantir are, and what are their government/defense contracts like vs. their commercial products division.

fight for government money can always get a little dirty. i'm sure good engineering happens there but they will always be colored by the HB Gary episode. plus the fact that partnering with a shady right wing corporate law firm and the HB Gary Federal clown will alway reflect badly on their general common sense judgement...

Re:Introducing Palantir's first open source releases by vlokshin on Wednesday December 14, 2011 @05:02PM (#3353842)
VERY good engineering/thinking/development happens here.

I was in a recruitment process with them back when I really wanted to make an immediate west coast jump, and the intelligence/competence across the board for their collective is simply unmatched.

Re:Introducing Palantir's first open source releases by Karunamon on Wednesday December 14, 2011 @02:02PM (#3353120)
I am often very perplexed why legitimate comments get downvoted. This is one of those times. WTH everyone, this isn't Reddit.
Re:Introducing Palantir's first open source releases by tedunangst on Wednesday December 14, 2011 @02:52PM (#3353315)
I don't see how caycep's comment enhances my understanding of the released software. It's just a big dump of ad hominem (as are practically all the other comments).
Re:Introducing Palantir's first open source releases by scrollbar on Wednesday December 14, 2011 @03:23PM (#3353434)
Palantir open sourcing their software could and should be viewed through a PR lens, an action meant to build favorable reputation in the developer community. Maybe caycep could have elaborated on this more, but I understand the point: Palantir has a mixed history, so we should take the positive with a grain of salt and beware.