I have a high baseline anxiety and pretty much no memory of anything pre 8 (except for very small fragments). When I’ve come across amnesia part while reading “Body keeps scores”, it frankly frightened me (and still does) of what might be lurking in my past.
It can even be minor, little things that can cause memory splits in children for survival sake. These splits set the ground for future splits.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/48655845-who-am-i-in-a-t...
As I've been healing more and growing as a person, my extended and close family, which unfortunately are extremely dysfunctional, have pushed me away more and more. It seems like most people have a story like that, which is why I do have hopes that journeywork and related spiritualism, or at least some kind of vehicle, social or otherwise, with that kind of strong effect comes forward in the coming years.
Thanks for putting the book down too, now I'm really interested to read it. :D :))))
Anywho.
Don't rush the process please, of whatever it is. Your body and brain are probably right in some way. It's okay to practice breathing and what Pete Walker talks about in his book, or my go-to starter for anyone even near the topic -- Janina Fisher's "Healing the Fragmented Selves of Trauma Survivors". So good, very little triggering too which is excellente by me.
The main book people read on Polyvagal therapy that's really popular and well rated us good too, I think the author may have been a Susan? That's a good follow-up but more a rider-on/adjunct to me of a very specific "okay how do we get the body in a more continuous kind of safe state. :D :)"
C-PTSD actually requires a lot of work to properly diagnose, whereas GAD tends to be "Anxiety: The Condition", which allows a clinician to diagnose in an insurance company and report friendly way. It can help a person start their journey but is a shallow diagnosis.
Generally C-PTSD is a plethora of things -- internal fragmentation (~1 in 12 or so people are diagnosably plural afaik from the studies I found [i.e. osdd, which no one seems to really know about, to did], though most plurals will never find out about their plurality as it is exceptionally stealthy. Also it's a spectrum meant to hide itself from the brain's "user", as it were, so the subtlety of spectrum disorders adds to the mix), difficulty in relationships (it is in the trifecta of "social stuff trouble conditions" of ADHD, autism, and, well, cPTSD), generally at least occasionally unstable emotional state (which can be entirely internal) which oftentimes is hypersensitive to environmental triggers, and a need for control of relationships and environment (not necessarily evil top hat villain manipulation, this can even be just using a fawn trauma response in constantly giving up self to an extraordinary amount to keep the peace, keep relationships, etc).
Everything seems to be on a co-spectrum, cPTSD is just a map marker for a family I'd contest. It has a ton of overlaps with BPD, for example. cPTSD is differentiated from DID in that the different parts of the brain in cPTSD are not considered especially distinct, but there's also some tricky DID business people's brains can play to stuff certain nearly independent parts of a person away so they'd look more like a low-level cPTSD kind of automatic trauma triggered/autonomic response, etc.
I'm not a clinician, etc, etc, hope that helps from a technical perspective some. Feel free to ask any questions you might have. :)
Really glad you liked Pete's book. Janina Fisher's "Healing the Fragmented Selves of Trauma Survivors" is my other greatest of all time book in the area that I recommend. It's my first go-to over "The Body Keeps the Score" just because somehow Dr. Fisher has a method that works palatably with someone from even "low-grade" trauma to even what I think would be some polyfragmented DID systems, in some kind of Jedi-mind trick set of tools that works really well while dodging most of the myriad of situational triggers that are unique to each trauma survivor. I highly recommend it if you're interested, it adds a flip side of compassion and self-team building that I think Walker's book can go a bit harshly on as it seems to be more centric on the part of the brain experiencing daily life as the reference for others to be compared to. Both books are fantastic and balance each other out, I just started my second read on Fisher's book and am trying to wrap up Walker's. Give that one a go if you're interested, the audiobook is the cheapest!
Happy to chat about the topic, I love and am passionate about this field as you can guess. :D :)
I'm not necessarily DX'ing but I wish someone had pointed me at some resources when I was just starting to ask the inkling of the same questions. I'm getting to do the work at a much younger age that I see not many people doing until the end of their lives, though it is sort of hell being young and all.
Pete Walker's book on Complex PTSD is an amazing read regardless for anyone in the community, I'd say without diagnosing that as a potential avenue -- take a read of a few snippets, see if they resonate with you (or trigger massive denial/distraction chains), and just work your way through the book slowly if so. The techniques in there can help anyone with even "just" an internal (or otherwise) critic. :)
Hope this helps, the brain is an interesting place and we've only gotten some really good resources for misc conditions that don't externally seem to fit a particular mold. I'm starting to believe that every trauma reaction variant is some exemplar mode of some superset of possible adaptive coping mechanisms, and that in reality the dx and treatment of these things can be much more on point than the diagnosis of "anxiety" or "depression", which I'm viewing more and more as exceptionally frivolous and misleading as a standalone diagnosis (instead of as a descriptor, or a modifier), and is oftentimes as effective as diagnosing someone with "a fever" or "chills and aches". Doing so would alienate the person (in my eyes) and would take a place in a/the diagnosis "slot" that could hold something more informative to their actual base condition (instead of being a rather shallow observation with practically zero actionable value.... And we wonder why a variety of treatments for depression, for example, have low-30's success ratings across multiple stages of trying different treatments! I can't remember the exact numbers but the 4-5 stage...STAR study, I think it is, was one of the biggest and rather disappointing. The future seems somewhat promising but still too far away.... ::( )
Knowing _why_ is the very extremely hard part. :))))