Apple Execs on iMessage for Android (2013)

Re:Apple Execs on iMessage for Android (2013) by philliphaydon on Monday November 07, 2022 @12:20AM (#33501503)

Every time someone complains about ram in the iPhone it’s evidence they don’t know what they are talking about and chase the numbers trends of android.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple Execs on iMessage for Android (2013) by bakugo on Monday November 07, 2022 @01:21AM (#33501873)

If you're not paying for numbers, what are you paying for then? What reason could there be to pay $400 for a 2022 iphone that doesn't provide anything that a $400 android from 5 years ago doesn't?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple Execs on iMessage for Android (2013) by philliphaydon on Monday November 07, 2022 @02:05AM (#33502147)

Well I’m not paying for ram. Obviously everything is subjective but iOS is better than android, better camera, better eco system, better privacy and security, better battery life over time, better lifetime support, etc etc etc.

iPhone runs well on 3gb, 4gb, 6gb. It’s far more optimised than android.

The same cannot be said for android. Over time lack of ram cripples it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple Execs on iMessage for Android (2013) by approxim8ion on Tuesday November 08, 2022 @06:21AM (#33518029)

the battery life on the new SE is dreadful from day 1. Everything else is broadly true.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple Execs on iMessage for Android (2013) by dmit on Monday November 07, 2022 @05:04AM (#33503794)

> If you're not paying for numbers, what are you paying for then?

Oh honey...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple Execs on iMessage for Android (2013) by uni_rule on Monday November 07, 2022 @01:59PM (#33510510)

a smug sense of superior and/or very long term OS updates

[ Parent | on HN ]