Re:White House deletes tweet after Twitter adds 'context' note
by kaba0 on Saturday November 05, 2022 @02:09AM
(#33478455)
Well, I don’t know. In many countries it has devolved into football-fan level love/hatred that benefits no one.
Also, chances are neither of the two parties fit what you want. Especially in the US it is basically choosing the lesser evil..
Re:White House deletes tweet after Twitter adds 'context' note
by brnaftr361 on Saturday November 05, 2022 @12:53PM
(#33483192)
You might give Neil Postman's "How to Watch the TV News" a shot. He had some very prescient points regarding media and how it has transformed politics. Chomsky also has some interesting points on partisan politics.
But yeah, I totally agree, it just seems like very narrow minded allegiance. I think in the US it has a lot to do with conflicting interests of people in high-density places and the rural. I've got a population map overlayed on election results right now, and the data seems to fit that conclusion.
"We" are all held, arbitrarily, in the same group, which is... Absurd. It's like a hostage situation and it seems nobody has recognized that we're being held involuntarily.
There's also a considerable barrier to entry. Louis Rossmann had Larry Sharpe on, who had an interesting talking points in the first three minutes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhqTxlxOQBM
I think the key point is that the media wouldn't cover him if he didn't buy ads, and the cost of a poll stood at $40,000. How far can you campaign on a shoestring budget? It's a little easier when you can pool resources through an institution or a party while also gaining the immense benefit of a much more robust network of connections.
Those are some of the infrastructural barriers we've got to overcome, and I can't imagine that movement in that direction would go uncontested. It's quite the uphill battle.