News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Lisp? by Davidbrcz on Friday November 04, 2022 @07:58AM (#33465156)
Just to add on that.

In 2015, Paris Airport Air Traffic Software were running on windows 3.1.

Is windows 3.1 outdated ? Yes. No longer a public facing product ? Yes.

Dead ? Absolutely not (at least back then, maybe it got decommissioned).

Around that time, a friend of mine was doing his master Thesis in an astronomy lab. He had to load fortran 77 routines from a 5" floppy disk that were doing critical computation (they were in the process of migrating). Same diagnosis: outdated, became a niche product, but not dead at all.

Re:Why Lisp? by kgwgk on Friday November 04, 2022 @08:11AM (#33465276)
Are there new things being developed based on windows 3.1?

Are there new things being developed based on lisp?

The analogy is not very good.

Re:Why Lisp? by ctrlmeta on Friday November 04, 2022 @08:20AM (#33465380)
> Are there new things being developed based on windows 3.1?

No

> Are there new things being developed based on lisp?

Yes.

> The analogy is not very good.

I guess I am missing your point. Care to elaborate your point?

Re:Why Lisp? by kgwgk on Friday November 04, 2022 @08:51AM (#33465719)
Lisp and Windows 3.1 are “not dead” in very different ways.

Put otherwise, as https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33465597 says one could define “dead” in a way that Win 3.1 is dead but Lisp is not (not more than usual anyway).