> insufferable megalomaniac
Nah. He's arrogant, to be sure, but nobody would attempt SpaceX or Tesla without being arrogant. It's a feature, not a bug.
> I don't think his goals at twitter are long term profitability or a healthier American society/democracy
Do you really think he spent $44B on Twitter to lose money on purpose?
To the last point: Yes, I think he could. When you have $150,000,000,000, even losing $149,000,000,000 would leave you with $1,000,000,000, which is hundreds and hundreds of times the lifetime net worth of most Americans.
Meaning yes, I can completely imagine someone with his money spending a lot of money to have major influence over how the world communicates. Bloomberg spent a billion dollars of his own money trying to be president and he's still quite rich.
The Clintons made around $100 million for being President. The Clinton Foundation is worth $300b, and is largely used to fund the Clintons. Obama is worth $70 million. Trump initially viewed his run for office as publicity stunt for his businesses. He was obviously surprised that he won.
Being President is very, very lucrative.
> FWIW Tesla literally did exist before he was involved
I know. And without Musk nobody would have ever heard of it.
[1] https://www.clintonfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11...
Shotwell runs certain parts of the business day to day. Elon heads up new projects whereas daily operations goes to Shotwell, which makes sense given her position of Chief Operating Officer. For example, by her own words, she has little involvement in the Starship project, or didn't as of early 2021 when asked about it.