News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Invasive Diffusion: one unwilling illustrator found her t... by thordenmark on Tuesday November 01, 2022 @08:23PM (#33429831)
Napster distributed whole songs. If it sampled 1000's of songs then created original compositions that sounded kind of like the 'style' of those songs what would the legalities be? That is a huge difference. I'm a professional artist who has been able to make a good living and support a family, what does this mean when someone with an algorithm and some key words can produce good-enough work in a fraction of the time for pennies? There is a huge swath of professional artists whose livelihoods are at stake.

Is this like the stagecoach makers when automobiles where invented? Or is this like Napster stealing copyrighted material? This is new territory.

Re:Invasive Diffusion: one unwilling illustrator found her t... by tomrod on Tuesday November 01, 2022 @09:58PM (#33430585)
Very much the first.

(1) Ubiquitous new technology

(2) New domains the technology opens

It's even more fundamental than stagecoach --> automobile. It is more like cipher --> RSA -- fundamental change based on basic math and ubiquitous, readily available technology.

The toothpaste is out of the tube!