Re:Twitter to lay off 25% of workforce in first round of job...
by anecdotal1 on Monday October 31, 2022 @07:52PM
(#33415075)
> Musk has precedent
The "has" makes it seem like it was a legal statement. It probably should be been worded differently
Re:Twitter to lay off 25% of workforce in first round of job...
by MikeTheGreat on Monday October 31, 2022 @08:01PM
(#33415142)
Agreed. Perhaps something like
"...so that's a precedent that shows that Musk is willing/has done something like this"
Re:Twitter to lay off 25% of workforce in first round of job...
by agsnu on Tuesday November 01, 2022 @02:40AM
(#33417778)
See https://ludwig.guru/s/has+precedent for a plenty of examples of using "has precedent" in non-legal contexts.
No, you're thinking of a restricted version of the second definition from Merriam-Webster, while it was clearly the first definition that was meant.
precedent. noun
1. an earlier occurrence of something similar
2. a : something done or said that may serve as an example or rule to authorize or justify a subsequent act of the same or an analogous kind a verdict that had no precedent b : the convention established by such a precedent or by long practice