Re:The Fallacy of Premature Optimization
by osigurdson on Monday October 31, 2022 @04:47PM
(#33412812)
>> My claim is that we all have things we believe dogmatically. They for the axioms of our mental models.
I agree but think of it as a scalar. Some mental models are assigned a "conviction" of 1.0 - that could be considered dogma. Some (like the expectation of what tomorrow's weather might be like) may have a "conviction" of 0.3.
Re:The Fallacy of Premature Optimization
by trashtester on Monday October 31, 2022 @05:00PM
(#33413038)
Sounds like a Bayesian Network, which is precisely how I tend to think about it.
Though I think one aspect is missing, namely something describing the emotional loss that will be felt if a dogma has to be rejected.
In fact, the most destructive dogmas may be those where the older has serious subconscious doubt about the validity of the belief, but where their entire identiy may be shattered if they have to give it up.
Questioning such dogma tends to become very strong taboos or potentially heresies worthy of cancelling or even death.
Most of us will have a hard time recognizing our own dogma.
My claim is that we all have things we believe dogmatically. They for the axioms of our mental models. Take away the dogma, and our entire mental framework risks getting shattered.
If we completely fail to understand this, though, we are at risk of constructing rationalistic (as opposed to rational) frameworks on top, in believe in them absolutely. This can lead to fanatical movements such as Islamic suicide bombers, "Objetivist" capitalists, Extinctin Rebellion or Conquistador Missionaries.
And also all sorts of cargo cults in software development.