News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on A Tour of C++, 3rd edition (covering C++20 plus a few likely features of C++23). Parent comment

Re:A Tour of C++, 3rd edition (covering C++20 plus a few lik... by kramerger on Sunday October 30, 2022 @09:50AM (#33394499)
What do you mean? It has ALWAYS been like this.

It was even worse in the old Microsoft C++ days.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A Tour of C++, 3rd edition (covering C++20 plus a few lik... by pjmlp on Sunday October 30, 2022 @10:18AM (#33394705)
Microsoft C++ is leading the green boxes on C++20 compliance.

https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/compiler_support/20

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A Tour of C++, 3rd edition (covering C++20 plus a few lik... by jcelerier on Sunday October 30, 2022 @10:30AM (#33394785)
The boxes may be green but just two weeks ago I had to report two msvc bugs, one against if constexpr and one against requires-expression, which breaks very simple language examples. In practice it's much buggier than GCC (second least buggier) and Clang (by far the least buggy, I think I only ever reported a couple of core bugs to clang versus maybe 30+ for MSVC even though Clang is my main compiler and I use MSVC only for testing)
[ Parent | on HN ]