News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staff’s code, workers said. Parent comment

Re:Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staf... by tedunangst on Saturday October 29, 2022 @09:40PM (#33390036)
Because Musk ordering a bunch of TSLA employees to do whatever isn't so hard to believe?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staf... by wyclif on Saturday October 29, 2022 @10:16PM (#33390329)
If you think Musk didn't run it past legal first, you're delusional.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staf... by drakythe on Saturday October 29, 2022 @10:27PM (#33390408)
He signed a contract waiving due diligence, agreeing to buy a company at a frankly ludicrous valuation compared to their stock price and then tried to back out saying they wouldn’t let him do due diligence.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staf... by lupire on Saturday October 29, 2022 @10:26PM (#33390398)
Musk has in the last been officially sanctioned by the government for disobeying a direct order to...run things by Legal before putting them on Twitter.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staf... by FireBeyond on Sunday October 30, 2022 @01:32AM (#33391394)
What 'legal'?

Tesla hasn't had General Counsel since 2019.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staf... by squokko on Sunday October 30, 2022 @02:18AM (#33391701)
LOL. Musk clearly does a ton of shit without running it by legal first. Not that it's really hurt him.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staf... by wyclif on Sunday October 30, 2022 @04:20AM (#33392339)
Maybe, but not the due diligence stuff which is what I was referring to.
[ Parent | on HN ]