News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Obama Announces $2B Fund for Startups by rbanffy on Friday December 09, 2011 @07:50PM (#3336428)
Just as a side note, you really don't want an executive branch that can do that (fixing the immigration and patent systems).

edit: sorry if it didn't end up as clear as it should

Re:Obama Announces $2B Fund for Startups by thmcmahon on Friday December 09, 2011 @08:15PM (#3336512)
Works OK for countries with parliamentary democracies.
Re:Obama Announces $2B Fund for Startups by jacques_chester on Friday December 09, 2011 @10:12PM (#3336792)
Parliamentary democracies still have distinct executive branches.
Re:Obama Announces $2B Fund for Startups by dimitar on Saturday December 10, 2011 @08:35AM (#3337534)
Sure, but they are usually appointed by the majority party of parliament and its leader becomes head of government.
Re:Obama Announces $2B Fund for Startups by maaku on Saturday December 10, 2011 @05:45PM (#3338708)
No, that's how a dictatorship works, not a parliamentary democracy. The prime minister/head of state may set policy, but it's still subject to an up/down vote in the parliament. In all cases I can think of, a prime minister can't unilaterally make such drastic changes without (parliamentary) referendum.

The U.S.'s federated system just makes it more explicit what's going on.

Re:Obama Announces $2B Fund for Startups by anigbrowl on Friday December 09, 2011 @07:52PM (#3336440)
-
Re:Obama Announces $2B Fund for Startups by anigbrowl on Friday December 09, 2011 @11:00PM (#3336876)
The above isn't meant as a comment - it was a question that was answered by an edit in the grandparent, but I then carelessly edited this instead of deleting it. By the time I noticed the error the edit/delete window had closed.