What would make anyone believe that they would?
Global average temperatures aren’t the whole story.
So that's where they get their numbers. And who's GWPF? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Warming_Policy_Foundati... Ah, yes!
Look at their most recent report, they show "Data deficient" for most subpopulations. I think the other comment is likely correct, the population is going up, but for reasons unrelated to the existence of global warming. https://www.iucn-pbsg.org/
This doesn't fit the environmentalist narrative well, so the most prominent statistics on their homepage aren't directly related to polar bear populations, but things like "The mean rate of decline in summer sea ice area across all subpopulations "
https://web.archive.org/web/20151224224314/http://pbsg.npola...
You could get pretty good population estimates by just reviewing random 1 km^2 samples for bears and then extrapolating.
Ah yes, the polar bears. When I was in middle school we watched An Inconvenient Truth by Al Gore and I wrote a well-referenced essay on how polar bears would probably be extinct by 2020, as he says in the documentary. Since then, their numbers have steadily increased [1]*
https://insight.factset.com/polar-bears-bullish-or-bearish-o....
Maybe you should find a way to short Florida beach properties instead, since they should all be below water in about 10-15 years?