News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The legal rule (Eng&Wales) that computers are presumed to... by dusted on Tuesday October 25, 2022 @09:08AM (#33329965)
"Oh, but the computer is doing the right more often than (9.4608e+16)-1 times out of 9.4608e+16 times!"*

Yes.. but that's "less than" a single mistake per year, per computer. How many cores do your data go through per year ?

* Totally made up, rough number of cpu ticks of a 3 ghz core in a year.

Still, the point I'm trying to make is that with the mind-numbing number of actions carried out by another mind-numbing number of machines on a third absolutely mind-numbing number of bits every year, you will need a metric fuckton of zeroes after your decimal point, before it's "not going to put innocent people in jail".

Re:The legal rule (Eng&Wales) that computers are presumed to... by cwillu on Tuesday October 25, 2022 @12:58PM (#33333205)
If it's metric, it's a fucktonne, not a fuckton.

‹ducks›

Re:The legal rule (Eng&Wales) that computers are presumed to... by dusted on Tuesday October 25, 2022 @02:20PM (#33334287)
Interesting, didn't know that, thanks! :)

In Danish we use the word "Ton" which is 1000 Kg, didn't realized that English has two words for it, didn't realize there's an emperial ton either :D

Re:The legal rule (Eng&Wales) that computers are presumed to... by sirtomato on Wednesday October 26, 2022 @11:14AM (#33344971)
Yep, US customary ton is 2000lb