News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Python 3.11.0 final is now available by coldtea on Tuesday October 25, 2022 @07:07AM (#33328910)
>As for it was a good idea, this has already been debated and acted upon, there is no need to repeat exactly the same arguments.

Well, the same debates happened over many other decisions debated, acted upon, and later regretted and reverted. At some point the GIL seemed like a good decision too!

Re:Python 3.11.0 final is now available by macintux on Tuesday October 25, 2022 @07:40AM (#33329183)
Obviously the complexity level is different, but to me you sound like someone complaining about Linux adding support for a new filesystem, but read-only at first. Why all the hostility?
Re:Python 3.11.0 final is now available by coldtea on Tuesday October 25, 2022 @08:47AM (#33329749)
It's a complain about a release decision. Where's the hostillity?

No need to project psychology on it...

Re:Python 3.11.0 final is now available by iainmerrick on Tuesday October 25, 2022 @08:04AM (#33329374)
That's an argument for not adding a TOML writer right now. The correct design isn't obvious so there'd be a risk of a bad design getting locked in.
Re:Python 3.11.0 final is now available by kortex on Tuesday October 25, 2022 @08:14AM (#33329457)
The GIL is a good decision and has been a sound engineering tradeoff for decades. It's only been the past few years that running the interpreter without a GIL has been even remotely feasible (cf the gilectomy project). The GIL is a relatively straightforward way to hold back a tremendous amount of complexity.

Similarly, TOML writing is a ton of completely. The org isn't opposed to adding toml writing to the stdlib fundamentally, they just aren't rushing and want to hammer out all of the grossness first.