Re:Show HN: IHP v1.0 (Batteries-included web framework built...
by njaremko on Monday October 24, 2022 @12:27PM
(#33318819)
It looks like Docker support is still a paid feature? That's disappointing. I had written a blog post outlining how important docker support was and explaining how little work it was to get working, and at the time the maintainers agreed it should be a free feature, but it seems they've changed their minds.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: IHP v1.0 (Batteries-included web framework built...
by _query on Monday October 24, 2022 @12:29PM
(#33318837)
There's some unofficial ways to build docker images, check https://zacwood.me/posts/building-ihp-apps-github-actions/ :)
We've not changed our minds on docker becoming a free feature eventually. We just didn't update the pricing yet, but this is planned for the near future.
Re:Show HN: IHP v1.0 (Batteries-included web framework built...
by VTimofeenko on Monday October 24, 2022 @01:01PM
(#33319266)
If it's using nix for building - there's multiple ways to DIY turn that into a docker container, like pkgs.dockerTools.buildImage or nixpacks:
Re:Show HN: IHP v1.0 (Batteries-included web framework built...
by _query on Monday October 24, 2022 @01:06PM
(#33319325)
IHP is really easy to package with nix nowadays. In fact the official docker building also just uses `pkgs.dockerTools.buildImage` and calls nix-build :) Most people with nix experience can easily figure out how to do exactly the same thing as the "official" way.