News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Plastic recycling remains a 'myth': Greenpeace study by dboreham on Monday October 24, 2022 @11:42AM (#33318164)
Because the entire purpose of the numbered markings is to allow more plastic to be sold. It's a psyop designed to prevent outrage at the waste and pollution from single-use containers from reducing sales. Any actual recycling done is incidental to the primary goal.
Re:Plastic recycling remains a 'myth': Greenpeace study by robocat on Monday October 24, 2022 @06:58PM (#33323754)
Rubbish. You think that having no numbering is better? The numbered markings are necessary to enable recycling.

The real problem is that trashing waste is often the least worst solution for our environment. Expensive “green” packaging and recycling, are too often actually worse for the environment. Feel good movements that kill the planet quicker. Often sold to us via industry propaganda but we childishly are willing recipients for mistruth: we collectively want an anodyne panacea where we can continue to consume without consequences, a convenient lie, a palatable excuse.

To fix the actual problem requires giving up our nice things, giving up on our wants, reducing our spending, or reducing population. We cannot accept those requirements, so we all merrily go along with greenwashing denialism.

The two best indicators for your environmental impact are: (1) your income, and (2) your country. I’m guessing you are a well off US citizen: you are the problem. Not some evil corporation.