People get mad at concrete re:co2, but compare its lifespan to wood, without preservatives.

How many houses, without preservatives in the wood, would rot and be rebuilt, compared to 100% concrete/rock housing?

And with each rebuild, comes all the wiring, plumbing, which is rarely recycled well, and recycling isn't environmentally cost free.

ICF seems a good idea to me.

> How many houses, without preservatives in the wood, would rot and be rebuilt, compared to 100% concrete/rock housing?

This isn't a useful comparison, as unreinforced concrete is not used for concrete. If you're speaking about steel reinforced concrete, they usually have a lifespan in the 100 year range for something protected from the elements like structural walls. For comparison, much of the housing stock in my area is stick framed and is of a similar age - ~70 years.

Probably very few since interior wood is not pressure treated.

You’re not wrong, but there are also any number of rules about building code that try to prevent water infiltration, which makes the wood last many times longer.

For instance, wood laid horizontally in water doesn’t wick water as far as wood standing vertically in water. If you look at deck and house designs you see a lot of horizontal pieces. Especially in new construction.

That said, letting water pool at the corner of your house can eat your foundation too. Water is bad. Get rid of it.

Preservatives aren't to prevent rot, but instead, to prevent insect, mould, fungus, etc from eating/rotting the wood.

Moisture can come from the air, and damaged/poor air separation. Insects are, well, they're insects.

And of course, there are mice, ground squirrels, and other critters which chew on wood relentlessly. If I didn't kill 100+ mice a year, and a few ground squirrels, I'd be up to my elbows in critters, not to mention, dead from the hantavirus, and my house burned down from wire damage.

German maker Laura Kampf is doing a video series on restoring a a 140 year old house. It turned into a much bigger project due to water damage that destroyed large parts of the wood frame and stone work. It’s interesting to watch if you’re into that sort of thing. She’s more of a maker type than a home renovation type so she comes at it from a different perspective.

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLLsyCFICnr819K6cWPGm1...

When I was a kid, finding water damage on This Old House projects would increase the budget by 50%. The owners always looked like they wanted to puke during the wrap up episode.

You probably don't want 100 or even 50 years old wiring and plumbing tho.

And it only "helps" if the future owner doesn't decide to destroy it and build something else anyway

This reminds me of the "designing a house to last 1000 years" article discussed on here earlier in the year, and the many factors that the author considered there.

https://constructionphysics.substack.com/p/how-to-design-a-h...

One can go down a pretty nasty toxic waste rabbit hole if you research all the attempts at chemical treatment for wood utility poles (for electrical grid and telecom, historically). Particularly a place like WA, OR, ID, BC having plenty of trees also has a mostly aerial electrical and telecom distribution last mile. And of course the companies that own and must maintain these poles have an interest in them lasting as long as possible...

My understanding right now is they've gone back to more traditional tar/creosote impregnated and coatings.

Don't forget rail ties!

I met someone whose ancestors lived in Missouri clearing the swamps. Those swamp trees made good railroad ties. And then creosote was introduced and the ties lasted ten times as long, so demand crashed over the next few years as the old ties were swapped out one last time.

As near as I can tell the economy never recovered. They grew cotton but that’s mostly overseas now too, and at any rate means arsenic accumulation.

Some people were trying to engineer a strain of rice that absorbs less arsenic. Apparently cotton and rice growing conditions overlap enough that this is a potential option.