Clojure 15th Anniversary: A Retrospective

Re:Clojure 15th Anniversary: A Retrospective by frou_dh on Saturday October 22, 2022 @04:55AM (#33296626)

I don't know - the kind of programmer who's always worried about every what-if probably shouldn't choose any dynamic interactive language in the first place. There are plenty of language permutations out there for all sensibilities.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Clojure 15th Anniversary: A Retrospective by synthc on Saturday October 22, 2022 @10:04AM (#33298406)

But programmers should be worried about every what-if scenario, regardless of language.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Clojure 15th Anniversary: A Retrospective by funstuff007 on Saturday October 22, 2022 @06:17PM (#33302701)

> worried about every what-if

I hear you about this, but during prototyping one cannot be excessively concerned with did I change the global state enough such that it's better to just start a new REPL (and have to worry about the associated costs)? And if you ask this question a lot, long running REPLs are not a good idea for development.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Clojure 15th Anniversary: A Retrospective by synthc on Sunday October 23, 2022 @03:09AM (#33305174)

for prototyping a long running repl is fine.

For validation/testing starting with a clean slate takes away a lot of my worries.

[ Parent | on HN ]