Re:San Francisco to Spend $1.7M to Build a Single Public Toilet
by mattnewton on Thursday October 20, 2022 @12:06PM
(#33276768)
Because a human who can afford to live in San Francisco almost certainly costs more than this machine over 10 years (the 1.7 million is for the whole project, not just the self cleaning portion), and drugged out crazies can make a mess that would be a very hard and unpleasant job to give a human.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:San Francisco to Spend $1.7M to Build a Single Public Toilet
by 1024core on Thursday October 20, 2022 @12:15PM
(#33276902)
A large number of City employees live outside the City. According to this article, only 40% of the City employees live in SF. https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/remote-work-17510522....
So why is residence a requirement for the janitor??
Re:San Francisco to Spend $1.7M to Build a Single Public Toilet
by mattnewton on Thursday October 20, 2022 @01:24PM
(#33277873)
Sure, substitute live in San Francisco with live in commuting distance of San Francisco. It's not like Daly city or Oakland are cheap either.
Even when we focus on the fiscal aspect of it, I don't think a machine is a bad idea compared to a plan of "find some willing to clean up after addicts and the mentally ill at all hours" - how much would you need to be paid to take that job and show up to outcompete the toilet-dishwasher-machine every day? California has tons of other jobs and generous social programs.
And that's ignoring the angle that we're allocating a human life to this extremely unpleasant and automatable task.