Re:Intel Core I9-13900K and I5-13600K Review: Raptor Lake Br...
by neogodless on Thursday October 20, 2022 @11:31AM
(#33276265)
Yes.
For my desktop, I only care if it's possible to make it quiet overall.
For a laptop, I care about performance given the more restrictive cooling restraints of the form factor, and battery life (but that's secondary since I can usually use it plugged in anyway.)
So efficiency matters (including under load), but it can't be your only deciding factor in deciding what to buy and use.
Re:Intel Core I9-13900K and I5-13600K Review: Raptor Lake Br...
by mijamo on Thursday October 20, 2022 @02:05PM
(#33278416)
If you play any game then it's really not 60 seconds.
And then having a processor drawing this kind of power has impact on you PDU, cooling system, case...
mATX for instance makes nearly no sense with that kind of power use. But who wants a huge tower on their desk anymore?
How often do you run your CPU at 100% load across all cores? For me, idle power draw dominates my overall power consumption. The difference between a 100W peak CPU and a 300W peak CPU basically doesn’t matter across the course of my day, because even compiling large codebases doesn’t last very long.
I say this because I bought into the AMD efficiency hype a few years ago, ditching my Intel workstation for an AMD workstation. Yet according to my home energy monitor, my office circuit consumption actually went up, not down.
Further investigation revealed that my AMD desktop had significantly higher idle power than the old Intel one. Given that most of my day is spent typing, not pegging the CPU at full load, this nets out to higher overall power consumption.
So I’m back to not caring about peak power consumption. If the Intel CPU wants to pull 300W for the 60 seconds that my compile takes, go for it. What I’ll really be looking at is the idle power usage.