News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005) by KvanteKat on Thursday October 20, 2022 @04:38AM (#33272160)
For anyone who wants to get really into the weeds, here are all the articles in the sequence of discussion papers:

Main Paper (Jager and Leek): ttps://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxt007

Response papers:

  - Yoav Benjamini and Yotam Hechtlinger: https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxt032

  - David R. Cox: https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxt033

  - Andrew Gelman and Keith O'Rourke: https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxt034

  - Steven N. Goodman: https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxt035

  - John P. A. Ioannidis (the spicy response): https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxt036

  - Martijn J. Schuemie, Patrick B. Ryan, Marc A. Suchard, Zach Shahn, and David Madigan: https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxt037
Jaeger and Leeks' rejoinder to the responses: https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxt038

edit: fixed some formatting and link to main paper

There are no comments on this comment yet.