Heart risks, data gaps fuel debate over Covid-19 boosters for young people

Re:Heart risks, data gaps fuel debate over Covid-19 boosters... by AlphaOne1 on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @11:44PM (#33257352)

I would argue because no charity was given to opinions contrary to what Dr. Fauci and the NIH declaired as truth. Perhaps most infamous is Dr. Collins asking for a takedown of the Great Berington declaration. The fact that so little was certain early on about COVID should have been a reason to allow physicians and scientists to discuss and debate policy without fear of having their careers destroyed. Now that we are further out from the pandemic cooler heads will prevail but I fear the damage to the reputation of the health authorities in the US will take a long time to recover.

[1] https://www.statnews.com/2021/12/23/at-a-time-when-the-u-s-n...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Heart risks, data gaps fuel debate over Covid-19 boosters... by lern_too_spel on Wednesday October 19, 2022 @06:56AM (#33260275)

Dr. Collins didn't ask for their careers to be destroyed. He asked for a rebuttal (or "take down of it's premises" in his words), which was easy because The Great Barrington Declaration was the most poorly devised policy proposal I had ever seen. I'm not surprised that Dr. Prasad pretends not to understand the difference.

It said that only nursing homes should be quarantined when the vast majority of elderly do not live in nursing homes. It encouraged everyone else to get infected as soon as possible, completely ignoring the fact that vaccines were being developed, which meant that later exposure would be far better than earlier exposure.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Heart risks, data gaps fuel debate over Covid-19 boosters... by dekhn on Wednesday October 19, 2022 @11:49AM (#33263919)

Never take on Lior with anything less than a fully prepared and well-rested army.

[ Parent | on HN ]