News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:USB4 Specification v2.0 by mortenjorck on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @08:57PM (#33256101)
> When those products come out, though, the USB-IF hopes they aren't introduced to consumers as "USB4 Version 2.0" or even some type of "SuperSpeed USB." After 12 years, the USB-IF no longer recommends that vendors use terms like "SuperSpeed USB 20Gbps" (for the spec called USB 3.2 Gen 2x2, for example) and instead opt for names like "USB 20Gbps."

> If the USB-IF had its way, products using its new open standard will be described as "USB 80Gbps."

Despite the ongoing chaos of USB-IF's technical nomenclature, it sounds like they are well aware of the problem, and the consumer-facing solution they recommend doesn’t sound bad at all.

Re:USB4 Specification v2.0 by tuatoru on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @10:50PM (#33256934)
Are they going to allow color-coding and icons to indicate what a cable or connector is capable of?
Re:USB4 Specification v2.0 by wmf on Wednesday October 19, 2022 @12:44AM (#33257782)
The new branding just has Gbps and Watts. The problem is that 99% of USB cables seem to be unlabeled knockoffs; no branding system can solve that problem.