Californians may tax the rich more to subsidise electric cars

Re:Californians may tax the rich more to subsidise electric ... by arsome on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @03:11PM (#33252405)

> why in the hell did we decide that your home, work, grocery store and gym should all be in segregated parts of town where the only way to get from one place to another is an expensive hunk of metal.

Because we decided to prioritize things like peace and quiet, distance from people and outdoor spaces for play, cooking and recreation above not leaving a tiny bubble for your whole life.

Living in tiny condos sucks and isn't for everyone, this is the tradeoff we've chosen.

That said, I'd much rather have my kids walk to school in a suburb than a dense urban area.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Californians may tax the rich more to subsidise electric ... by 988747 on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @03:45PM (#33252846)

But that's the whole point: having suburbs be livable on their own, with schools, shops, doctor offices all in walking distance. I grew up in a small (2000 people) town in Central Europe, which had all that, plus some factories where majority of the population found employment, and it still felt like quiet, cozy place.

[ Parent | on HN ]