News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Californians may tax the rich more to subsidise electric ... by bombcar on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @12:34PM (#33250081)
And those still exist! And any “small town” is walkable almost by definition-but people move away from them to the outskirts of the cities.
Re:Californians may tax the rich more to subsidise electric ... by SpicyLemonZest on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @12:39PM (#33250153)
I don't think that's true. My grandparents live near a town of 4k people or so that's not walkable in the slightest, spread out over miles of highway with massive city-sized streets criscrossing everything. Certainly nobody can walk to the grocery store, which is on a hill far away from the residential areas.
Re:Californians may tax the rich more to subsidise electric ... by bombcar on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @02:06PM (#33251531)
I'm sure they exist, but what is around the grocery store that there's no houses within 2 miles?

Often the "new developments" near these towns are out of town a bit, but even two miles isn't an insane walk.

I'll grant that many of them don't have much in the way of sidewalks, but you can often find them.

Re:Californians may tax the rich more to subsidise electric ... by SpicyLemonZest on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @05:12PM (#33254063)
It has some unbuildable hills on one side, the county hospital on another, and then parking lots plus a giant highway interchange filling out the rest of the space.
Re:Californians may tax the rich more to subsidise electric ... by p0pcult on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @12:57PM (#33250447)
Go visit Chadron, Nebraska sometime. On foot. You'll see the error in your generalization.
Re:Californians may tax the rich more to subsidise electric ... by bombcar on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @02:00PM (#33251432)
Arial reconnaissance seems to show it similar to the town I'm in; it could use a bit more sidewalks but the old downtown is certainly walkable and even Walmart shows obvious paths where people are walking across the grass/ground.