News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GitHub Copi­lot inves­ti­ga­tion by xigoi on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @01:08AM (#33243187)
Google Search links to the original content. Copilot doesn't.
Re:GitHub Copi­lot inves­ti­ga­tion by janosdebugs on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @01:40AM (#33243372)
When you ask it a question, it will often simply construct an answer from the pages it indexed, so people don't have to click. Sure, it links it, but for what? Thankfully, the answers are almost always useless.
Re:GitHub Copi­lot inves­ti­ga­tion by johnfn on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @03:02AM (#33243924)
As I responded to someone else, this isn't always true. Google "when was George Washington born".
Re:GitHub Copi­lot inves­ti­ga­tion by hypertele-Xii on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @03:23AM (#33244055)
George Washington's birthday is hardly copyrightable.
Re:GitHub Copi­lot inves­ti­ga­tion by tommek4077 on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @03:36AM (#33244157)
So are most of your functions and methods.
Re:GitHub Copi­lot inves­ti­ga­tion by throwaway675309 on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @03:30AM (#33244117)
Maybe but it also uses those index cards that show a summary of information so you don't need to navigate to the actual website that contain the original content, there might be a link there but it's usually small and practically unnoticeable.
Re:GitHub Copi­lot inves­ti­ga­tion by xigoi on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @06:24AM (#33245202)
If Copilot provided a “small and practically unnoticeable” attribution to the code used, it would definitely improve the situation, especially for licenses like MIT that require attribution and nothing else.