News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GitHub Copi­lot inves­ti­ga­tion by visarga on Monday October 17, 2022 @07:49PM (#33241138)
> It would be because it's illegal and violates the licenses, desires, and intentions of the thousands of workers who wrote the code in its corpus.

Copilot makes source code much more open, if you think about it. It implements code reuse in a different way than classes and libraries. It offers its skills equally to everyone, skills learned from everyone.

As for the cost of the API - it's expensive to run large language models, I think the price is justified. But there are free models if you like to run your own.

Re:GitHub Copi­lot inves­ti­ga­tion by yjftsjthsd-h on Monday October 17, 2022 @07:54PM (#33241182)
And if it preserves licenses that's fine. Otherwise it's copyright infringement.
Re:GitHub Copi­lot inves­ti­ga­tion by jacooper on Monday October 17, 2022 @08:02PM (#33241254)
Free/libre software ≠ free as beer.