News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The dry-season malaria paradox, a bar to eradication, is ... by photochemsyn on Monday October 17, 2022 @10:19AM (#33233832)
It's a bit odd that 'The Economist' doesn't mention that the persisitence of malaria in sub-Saharan Africa is fundamentally an economic problem. Malaria used to plague the American South and was eradicated through coordinated efforts led by the federal government, so we already know how to do it (DDT has been replaced by non-persistent insecticides, water drainage and cleanup of standing water reservoirs (i.e. old tires etc.) that form breeding sites, etc.):

https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/about/history/index.html

Compare that to say, Niger:

> "Malaria remains a major public health issue in Niger and is endemic throughout the country. Malaria accounts for 28 percent of all illnesses and 50 percent of all recorded deaths. Children under five years of age account for about 62 percent of the burden of malaria."

https://www.pmi.gov/where-we-work/niger/

Notably, France has pulled billions of dollars worth of uranium out of its mines in Niger, while doing almost nothing to improve the economy of the country (which would provide the resources to run a decent malaria eradication campaign), so it's really just another colonial exploitation disaster tale.

Re:The dry-season malaria paradox, a bar to eradication, is ... by hydraxis on Monday October 17, 2022 @10:44AM (#33234173)
The price France is paying for Niger's uranium has been higher that world market price for a long time. The main reason France has an interest in it is to be independent from Russia and Kazakhstan production.

Niger is a desert with catastrophic demographics.

Re:The dry-season malaria paradox, a bar to eradication, is ... by photochemsyn on Monday October 17, 2022 @10:54AM (#33234342)
I think if we compare the history of the relationship between America and Saudi Arabia (also a desert with catastropic demographics, but a rather different economic outcome) vs. that between France and its African colonies (or Britain and its India colony), we can see that European colonialism was actually a bit worse in outcome for its partners than what's known as American imperialism (which still has major problems, but not as bad as what Europe got up to).
Re:The dry-season malaria paradox, a bar to eradication, is ... by mrpopo on Monday October 17, 2022 @11:14AM (#33234621)
Your comparison is flawed and oversimplistic. You might as well consider the US as a former British colony and consider that British colonialism faired quite well.
Re:The dry-season malaria paradox, a bar to eradication, is ... by zymhan on Monday October 17, 2022 @01:12PM (#33236640)
Surely you realize that this is not their only article on Malaria?

https://www.economist.com/search?q=malaria

Re:The dry-season malaria paradox, a bar to eradication, is ... by hn_throwaway_99 on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @12:13AM (#33242887)
> It's a bit odd that 'The Economist' doesn't mention that the persisitence of malaria in sub-Saharan Africa is fundamentally an economic problem.

Is it really though? I'm always curious to understand how malaria eradication in the US was so successful, primarily because, at least now anyways, we have a shit ton of mosquitos in the South. Why doesn't malaria rise up in the US again? Is the geography and climate of Africa just much more conducive to malaria?

The CDC has a good page about the eradication of malaria in the US, https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/about/history/elimination_us.htm..., and I understand the measures that were taken. But again, many days if I go out without slathering myself in bug spray in the summer I'll be covered with mosquito bites, so I don't understand why malaria isn't more common. Are our mosquito species just different?

Re:The dry-season malaria paradox, a bar to eradication, is ... by shellfishgene on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @05:41AM (#33244930)
Probably the fact that in the US any malaria patient would be quickly diagnosed, isolated and treated plays a big role? It makes it a lot less likely that they would transmit it to the next mosquito.

Also in poor countries most people also get bitten in their house at night, with not screend doors or quality windows. I would assume this is pretty rare in well developed countries in comparison.

Re:The dry-season malaria paradox, a bar to eradication, is ... by foxyv on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @05:14PM (#33254079)
This is probably the most likely case. Malaria is a purely human disease with no animal reservoirs other than mosquitos as a vector. No malaria in the humans, no malaria in the mosquitos.