Re:$100B later, autonomous vehicles are still a car-wreck
by cycomanic on Saturday October 15, 2022 @05:49PM
(#33218974)
I believe there was some news that Mercedes was going for exactly that use case some time ago.
Re:$100B later, autonomous vehicles are still a car-wreck
by Gordonjcp on Saturday October 15, 2022 @06:29PM
(#33219251)
Why don't you go by train?
If you don't like driving, don't drive.
Re:$100B later, autonomous vehicles are still a car-wreck
by GaylordTuring on Sunday October 16, 2022 @08:05AM
(#33222959)
Maybe there isn’t a train available. Maybe it takes much longer time taking the train. Maybe you don’t like sitting close to other people for several hours each week.
I can think of many reasons why train wouldn’t be an option.
Re:$100B later, autonomous vehicles are still a car-wreck
by Gordonjcp on Sunday October 16, 2022 @02:02PM
(#33225721)
Then it sucks to be you. Don't drive if you don't like driving. Walk, or cycle. Or get a job that doesn't require you to commute.
Re:$100B later, autonomous vehicles are still a car-wreck
by nojvek on Sunday October 16, 2022 @02:29AM
(#33221531)
I’ve honestly been impressed by comma.ai. The little $1000 device does well with Seattle rain. Once it was snowing and it followed well.
It’s not perfect but I love that it makes it clear what it can and can’t do. It follows lanes on a highway and monitors you’re paying attention.
I just want a reliable car that can steer in the highway so I can eat a burger or answer a text message. GM’s SuperCruise is nearly there but has too many safety restrictions. It doesn’t need to work in inclement weather or construction zones. Being able to answer emails or watch a YouTube clip on a long road trip gives me back precious time that is worth paying a few thousand for.