News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Guthib by RivieraKid on Friday October 14, 2022 @10:53AM (#33204333)
I don't understand why people upvote this garbage. Do they find it funny? Or interesting?
Re:Guthib by amadeuspagel on Friday October 14, 2022 @10:55AM (#33204368)
> The most dangerous thing for the frontpage is stuff that's too easy to upvote. If someone proves a new theorem, it takes some work by the reader to decide whether or not to upvote it. An amusing cartoon takes less. A rant with a rallying cry as the title takes zero, because people vote it up without even reading it.

Paul Graham, What I've Learned from Hacker News[1]

[1]: http://www.paulgraham.com/hackernews.html

Re:Guthib by hnfong on Friday October 14, 2022 @11:11AM (#33204593)
He just explained why facebook and instagram feeds are just an endless stream of cat videos and scantily clad girls.
Re:Guthib by chaorace on Friday October 14, 2022 @12:01PM (#33205301)
Worth noting... he says this to contrast his surprise at how well the system works in the paragraph immediately prior:

> I once thought I'd have to weight votes to keep crap off the frontpage, but I haven't had to yet. I wouldn't have predicted the frontpage would hold up so well, and I'm not sure why it has. Perhaps only the more thoughtful users care enough to submit and upvote links, so the marginal cost of one random new user approaches zero. Or perhaps the frontpage protects itself, by advertising what type of submission is expected.

Re:Guthib by bszupnick on Friday October 14, 2022 @11:04AM (#33204508)
For me, at least, It's just nice to see a perfectly useful, quirky "thing" on the internet that isn't monetized or having some ulterior motives.

Hearkens back to that feeling of all of us being internet citizens and laughing that I'm not the only one that makes this mistake.

Maybe I'm looking into it too much, though ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Re:Guthib by tailspin2019 on Friday October 14, 2022 @11:36AM (#33204960)
I'm normally in favour of lighthearted stuff (to a degree), but in this case I agree with you. It seems a bit too low effort to warrant the high number of upvotes...
Re:Guthib by bradhoffman on Friday October 14, 2022 @10:54AM (#33204351)
Yes
Re:Guthib by theodric on Friday October 14, 2022 @11:20AM (#33204712)
certainly funny, too shallow to be interesting
Re:Guthib by yamtaddle on Friday October 14, 2022 @01:14PM (#33206284)
Good domain, terrible execution.

A copy of the GH home page but every image replaced with Strong Sad... now that's got potential. Or any number of other better uses of the domain name.

Re:Guthib by zach_garwood on Friday October 14, 2022 @12:15PM (#33205485)
Calm down. There are plenty of other, more serious links for you to click on this site. No need to be a buzzkill.
Re:Guthib by legrande on Friday October 14, 2022 @12:32PM (#33205696)
It's a Single Serving Site[0]. Not every URL needs to be a big diatribe of text.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-serving_site

[0] https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/sites/single-serving-site

Re:Guthib by wbecher on Friday October 14, 2022 @12:34PM (#33205742)
Yes.
Re:Guthib by seydor on Friday October 14, 2022 @12:38PM (#33205794)
It's the abstract art of posts