Re:Meta executives ‘inadvertently’ identified in OnlyFans br...
by jslaD on Thursday October 13, 2022 @11:05AM
(#33192036)
Isn’t this what gamergate was about?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Meta executives ‘inadvertently’ identified in OnlyFans br...
by nullish_signal on Thursday October 13, 2022 @12:26PM
(#33193202)
Yea basically,
Yellow Journalists in bed with Terrible Game Devs
Re:Meta executives ‘inadvertently’ identified in OnlyFans br...
by RajT88 on Thursday October 13, 2022 @01:36PM
(#33194128)
If you believe GamerGate was about what it purported to be about.
(It wasn't, and you shouldn't)
But anyways - you got at least the pretext correct.
Re:Meta executives ‘inadvertently’ identified in OnlyFans br...
by nullish_signal on Sunday October 23, 2022 @12:37PM
(#33308215)
So what pretext do you purport about Gamer Gate?
Your post does not include any clear opinions, just negations of who-knows-what
Re:Meta executives ‘inadvertently’ identified in OnlyFans br...
by consumer451 on Thursday October 13, 2022 @11:31AM
(#33192391)
How so? This Gamergate?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamergate_(harassment_campaign...
Re:Meta executives ‘inadvertently’ identified in OnlyFans br...
by jslaD on Thursday October 13, 2022 @12:26PM
(#33193193)
Yes, it’s well explained there - a woman had sex with a reporter to get publicity for a videogame that she had developed.
Re:Meta executives ‘inadvertently’ identified in OnlyFans br...
by UncleMeat on Thursday October 13, 2022 @12:46PM
(#33193490)
A woman had sex with a reporter. That reporter also blurbed a game she made. That is not the same as "she had sex with a reporter to get publicity."
Gamergate was trash from the beginning and only got more distasteful over time.
Re:Meta executives ‘inadvertently’ identified in OnlyFans br...
by LordDragonfang on Thursday October 13, 2022 @04:32PM
(#33196132)
And to be clear, said blurb on her game was a passing mention, not a review, and was published before they began their relationship.